From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Selak v. Murray Rubber Company

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1932
158 A. 544 (N.J. 1932)

Opinion

Submitted October 30, 1931 —

Decided February 1, 1932.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 8 N.J. Mis. R. 838.

For the respondent, Donald Reid Bryant.

For the appellants, Ralph N. Kellam.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, LLOYD, CASE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Selak v. Murray Rubber Company

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1932
158 A. 544 (N.J. 1932)
Case details for

Selak v. Murray Rubber Company

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW SELAK, RESPONDENT, v. MURRAY RUBBER COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 1, 1932

Citations

158 A. 544 (N.J. 1932)
108 N.J.L. 548

Citing Cases

Manley v. American Packing Co.

Goetz v. J.D. Carson Co., 206 S.W.2d 530; Stephens v. Spuck Iron Foundry Co., 214 S.W.2d 534. (2) The finding…

Randolph v. E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co.

In Newcomb v. Albertson, 85 N.J.L. 435, Mr. Justice Swayze, in dealing with a case where a condition…