From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seizer v. Furmark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 16, 1991
172 A.D.2d 300 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

April 16, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (C. Beauchamp Ciparick, J.).


In seeking to recover back salary and other compensation, plaintiff has made out a prima facie case for attempting to pierce the corporate veil of the defendant. Plaintiff was hired by Furmark, and served at his direction and pleasure during the period 1983-87, notwithstanding the fact that his salary checks may have been drawn by a corporate entity not a party to this action. The document discovery plaintiff seeks, which was ordered as long ago as December 1989, and which was never the subject of a motion for protection or appeal until October 1990, may shed light on the alleged connection between Furmark and his corporate structure.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Asch and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

Seizer v. Furmark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 16, 1991
172 A.D.2d 300 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Seizer v. Furmark

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM SEIZER, Respondent, v. ROY M. FURMARK et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 16, 1991

Citations

172 A.D.2d 300 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)