From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seiu Healthcare N.W. Training P'ship v. Evergreen Freedom Found.

Supreme Court of Washington.
Mar 6, 2019
192 Wash. 2d 1025 (Wash. 2019)

Opinion

No. 96560-9

03-06-2019

SEIU HEALTHCARE N.W. TRAINING PARTNERSHIP, Respondent, v. EVERGREEN FREEDOM FOUNDATION, Petitioner.


ORDER

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its March 5, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 The Petitioner's motion for extension of time to file a petition for review is granted. The petition for review is denied. The Respondent's request for attorney fees for filing an answer to the petition for review is granted. The Respondent is awarded reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to RAP 18.1(j). The amount of the attorney fees and expenses will be determined by the Supreme Court Clerk pursuant to RAP 18.1. Pursuant to RAP 18.1(d), the Respondent should file an affidavit with the Clerk of the Washington State Supreme Court.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Seiu Healthcare N.W. Training P'ship v. Evergreen Freedom Found.

Supreme Court of Washington.
Mar 6, 2019
192 Wash. 2d 1025 (Wash. 2019)
Case details for

Seiu Healthcare N.W. Training P'ship v. Evergreen Freedom Found.

Case Details

Full title:SEIU HEALTHCARE N.W. TRAINING PARTNERSHIP, Respondent, v. EVERGREEN…

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Mar 6, 2019

Citations

192 Wash. 2d 1025 (Wash. 2019)
435 P.3d 275

Citing Cases

Bombardier Inc. v. Mitsubishi Aircraft Corp.

Courts refer to this approach as "factual preemption" or the "strong" view of the UTSA's preemptive scope.…