From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seitzinger v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 28, 2012
54 A.3d 20 (Pa. 2012)

Opinion

2012-09-28

Wilbur SEITZINGER, Esquire and Seitzinger & Randazzo, Appellants v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, C/O Attorney General of Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry and Julia K. Hearthway, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry, and Stephen J. Fireoved, Director of the Pennsylvania Bureau of Workers' Compensation, Appellees.

No. 76 MAP 2011, Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court at No. 838 MDA 2010, dated July 28, 2011, 25 A.3d 1299 (Pa.Cmwlth.2011). Samuel C. Stretton, Law Office of Samuel C. Stretton, West Chester, for Wilbur Seitzinger, Esq., and Seitzinger & Randasso. Susan Jane Forney, Kenneth Lawson Joel, Linda L. Kelly, Calvin Royer Koons, Claude M. Tesoro, PA Office of the Attorney General, Harrisburg, for Office of the Attorney General and Department of Labor & Industry, et al.


No. 76 MAP 2011, Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court at No. 838 MDA 2010, dated July 28, 2011, 25 A.3d 1299 (Pa.Cmwlth.2011).
Samuel C. Stretton, Law Office of Samuel C. Stretton, West Chester, for Wilbur Seitzinger, Esq., and Seitzinger & Randasso. Susan Jane Forney, Kenneth Lawson Joel, Linda L. Kelly, Calvin Royer Koons, Claude M. Tesoro, PA Office of the Attorney General, Harrisburg, for Office of the Attorney General and Department of Labor & Industry, et al.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2012, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Seitzinger v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 28, 2012
54 A.3d 20 (Pa. 2012)
Case details for

Seitzinger v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:Wilbur SEITZINGER, Esquire and Seitzinger & Randazzo, Appellants v…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Sep 28, 2012

Citations

54 A.3d 20 (Pa. 2012)

Citing Cases

Zauflik v. Pennsbury Sch. Dist.

Pa. Const. art. V, § 1. This Court has stated that “our courts have integrated to some extent the separation…

Germantown Cab Co. v. Phila. Parking Auth.

" ‘Its object is basic and vital[:] ... to preclude a commingling of these essentially different powers of…