From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seip v. Esposito

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 3, 1980
78 A.D.2d 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

November 3, 1980


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant Roberto Frick appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 5, 1980, which denied his motion to amend his answer so as to include as an affirmative defense in mitigation of damages the plaintiff's failure to install seat belts in her car (in which she was riding as a passenger at the time of the accident) and/or her failure to use a seat belt restraint at the time of the accident. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted (see Karras v. County of Westchester, 71 A.D.2d 878). The amended answer, in the form annexed to the moving papers is deemed served. Titone, J.P., Mangano, Martuscello and Weinstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Seip v. Esposito

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 3, 1980
78 A.D.2d 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

Seip v. Esposito

Case Details

Full title:JACQUALYN SEIP, Respondent, v. GEORGE ESPOSITO, Defendant, and ROBERTO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 3, 1980

Citations

78 A.D.2d 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

Newton v. Aqua Flo Co.

Absent prejudice or surprise, leave to amend shall be freely granted (CPLR 3025, subd [b]). Upon…