From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seiler v. Riha

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Sep 18, 2013
838 N.W.2d 865 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

Nos. 2011AP1319 2011AP1485.

2013-09-18

In re the marriage of Christopher Thomas SEILER, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Amber RIHA f/k/a Amber Jean Seiler, Respondent–Respondent.

On March 1, 2011, the court entered a written order requiring Seiler to reimburse the county for the GAL fees. Relying on Olmsted v. Circuit Court for Dane Cnty., 2000 WI App 261, 240 Wis.2d 197, 622 N.W.2d 29, Seiler argues that an indigent party may not be ordered to pay GAL fees where the other party is not indigent.



Summaries of

Seiler v. Riha

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Sep 18, 2013
838 N.W.2d 865 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Seiler v. Riha

Case Details

Full title:In re the marriage of Christopher Thomas SEILER, Petitioner–Appellant, v…

Court:Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Date published: Sep 18, 2013

Citations

838 N.W.2d 865 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013)
351 Wis. 2d 223
2013 WI App. 128