From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seigel Wolff v. Daniel Schmitt Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Dec 22, 1998
985 S.W.2d 373 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. ED73767.

OPINION FILED: December 22, 1998.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HONORABLE SANDRA F. HEMPHILL, JUDGE.

Christopher W. Dysart; Law Office of Christopher W. Dysart, Swansea, IL, for appellant.

Seigel Wolff, P.C., Michael A. Wolff, Charles A. Seigel, III, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before Mary K. Hoff, P.J. and Gary M. Gaertner and Mary Rhodes Russell, JJ.


ORDER


Daniel Schmitt Co. appeals from the trial court's judgment entered after a jury verdict in favor of Seigel Wolff, P.C. on its Petition for Damages seeking monetary relief for breach of contract and in quantum meruit.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. The evidence in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Seigel Wolff v. Daniel Schmitt Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Dec 22, 1998
985 S.W.2d 373 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Seigel Wolff v. Daniel Schmitt Co.

Case Details

Full title:SEIGEL WOLFF, P.C., PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT, vs. DANIEL SCHMITT CO.…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR

Date published: Dec 22, 1998

Citations

985 S.W.2d 373 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)