From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seifert v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Oct 24, 1946
157 F.2d 719 (2d Cir. 1946)

Opinion

Nos. 10-12, Docket 20143-20145.

October 24, 1946.

Petitions to Review Orders of the Tax Court of the United States.

Petitions by Maud B. Seifert, executrix of the estate of C. August Seifert, to review orders of the Tax Court of the United States redetermining deficiencies in the estate tax and income tax imposed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for the years 1925 to 1929, inclusive, and 1932 and 1935 and assessing a deficiency in income tax against petitioner individually.

Orders affirmed.

Raymond E. Hackett, of Stamford, Conn., for petitioner.

Helen Goodner, of Washington, D.C., Sewall Key, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., and Helen R. Carloss and Harold C. Wilkenfeld, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and FRANK, Circuit Judges.


The taxpayer appears to suppose that the Tax Court was bound to accept as conclusive the documents which the decedent executed, and disregard all the attending facts: A curious vestigial faith in the power of the written word. The decedent consistently cheated the Treasury in his income taxes, and in addition gave plenty of evidence that he regarded the supposititious gifts as passing no beneficial interest to the donees. Judge Kern, with a solicitude which the situation hardly demanded, went through the maze of fabrication before him with the utmost care, and reached the only conclusion which was rationally possible. There are, it is true, some expressions in the opinion in Marshall v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 57 F.2d 633, which give a shadow of support to the taxpayer's treatment of a part of the evidence here at bar, but we cannot assent to them; and Smith v. Commissioner, 7 Cir., 59 F.2d 533, the taxpayer's other sheet anchor, is so far afield as not to deserve discussion, except perhaps to observe that, during the fourteen years since it was decided, the scope of our review of orders of the Tax Court has been so straitened that it can scarcely be deemed in any event a valid authority today. Commissioner v. Tower, 327 U.S. 280, 66 S.Ct. 532; Lusthaus v. Commissioner, 327 U.S. 293, 66 S.Ct. 539.

Orders affirmed.


Summaries of

Seifert v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Oct 24, 1946
157 F.2d 719 (2d Cir. 1946)
Case details for

Seifert v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:SEIFERT v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and two other cases

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Oct 24, 1946

Citations

157 F.2d 719 (2d Cir. 1946)

Citing Cases

Appel v. Smith

77 F.2d 569; Blalock v. Allen, 5 Cir., 151 F.2d 927; Bradshaw v. Commissioner, 10 Cir., 150 F.2d 918;…