From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seidman v. M R Air Conditioning Corporation

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 11, 1965
205 N.E.2d 859 (N.Y. 1965)

Opinion

Submitted January 13, 1965

Decided February 11, 1965

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, LEWIS W. OLLIFFE, J.

Herbert Minster, Bernard Helfenstein and Irwin M. Strum for appellants.

Theodore D. Rothenberg for respondent.


Order reversed, with costs in all courts, and complaint dismissed upon the ground that plaintiff's failure to shut off the power on the air conditioning machine before attempting to replace the compressor belt was so careless as to amount to contributory negligence as a matter of law ( Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Amsterdam Color Works, 284 App. Div. 376, affd. 308 N.Y. 816).

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.


Summaries of

Seidman v. M R Air Conditioning Corporation

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 11, 1965
205 N.E.2d 859 (N.Y. 1965)
Case details for

Seidman v. M R Air Conditioning Corporation

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL SEIDMAN, Respondent, v. M R AIR CONDITIONING CORPORATION et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 11, 1965

Citations

205 N.E.2d 859 (N.Y. 1965)
205 N.E.2d 859
257 N.Y.S.2d 935

Citing Cases

Shorr v. Cohen Bros. Realty Construction Corp.

Thus, the Appellate Division, in the first of the two orders being reviewed, properly held that the trial…

Seidman v. M R Air Conditioning Corp.

Decided June 10, 1965 Appeal from ( 15 N.Y.2d 814) MOTIONS FOR…