Opinion
September, 1932.
On argument, order directing a discovery and inspection affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; inspection to proceed on five days' notice. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Seidman v. Eastern Pearl Button Works, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 1, 1932
236 App. Div. 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Summaries of
Seidman v. Eastern Pearl Button Works, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 1, 1932
236 App. Div. 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for
Seidman v. Eastern Pearl Button Works, Inc.
Case Details
Full title:ABRAHAM D. SEIDMAN, Respondent, v. EASTERN PEARL BUTTON WORKS…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Sep 1, 1932
Citations
236 App. Div. 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)