From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seiden v. Gogick, Seiden, Byrne O'Neill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 12, 2000
278 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued November 21, 2000

December 12, 2000.

In an action, inter alia, for an accounting, the defendants-counterclaim plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, J.), entered January 4, 2000, as granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to require them to post an undertaking to secure the plaintiff's interest in the defendant-counterclaim plaintiff Gogick, Seiden, Byrne O'Neill, LLP.

Russ Russ, P.C., Massapequa, N.Y. (David Bolton of counsel), for defendants-counterclaim plaintiffs-appellants.

Morrison Cohen Singer Weinstein, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Arthur J. Ciampi and Edward P. Gilbert of counsel), for plaintiff-respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the appellants' contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in directing them to post an undertaking (see, Partnership Law § 75; Netburn v. Fischman, 81 Misc.2d 117).


Summaries of

Seiden v. Gogick, Seiden, Byrne O'Neill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 12, 2000
278 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Seiden v. Gogick, Seiden, Byrne O'Neill

Case Details

Full title:MARK SEIDEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. GOGICK, SEIDEN, BYRNE O'NEILL, LLP…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 12, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
718 N.Y.S.2d 188

Citing Cases

Alam v. Ahmad

Moreover, it exists to prevent courts from intruding on daily operations of the partnership and to avoid…