From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seidel v. Hollander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 7, 1936
246 App. Div. 233 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

February 7, 1936.

Appeal from Supreme Court of New York County.

Morris Rappaport, for the appellant.

I. Arnold Himber, for the respondent.

Present — MARTIN, P.J., O'MALLEY, UNTERMYER, DORE and COHN, JJ.


Assuming, without deciding, that plaintiff's responsibility for the merchandise ceased upon shipment in this country, the defendant is nevertheless entitled to establish the condition of the merchandise on arrival in Europe, for the reason that such proof, if properly connected, will constitute some evidence of the condition of the merchandise at the time of shipment.

The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.


Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Seidel v. Hollander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 7, 1936
246 App. Div. 233 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Seidel v. Hollander

Case Details

Full title:EMIL SEIDEL, Respondent, v. HERMANN HOLLANDER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 7, 1936

Citations

246 App. Div. 233 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
285 N.Y.S. 233