From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seidel v. Bennett

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 21, 2015
Civil Action No. 15-23 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 21, 2015)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 15-23

07-21-2015

KYLE SEIDEL, Plaintiff, v. CHRIS BENNETT, et al., Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan
MEMORANDUM ORDER

This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(l)(A) and (B), and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72.

On June 25, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 9) recommending that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, because Plaintiff has failed to apprise the Court of his current address. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made on Plaintiff's address of record, and no objections have been filed.

After a review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered:

This case is DISMISSED for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated June 25, 2015, hereby is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED. July 21, 2015

s\Cathy Bissoon

Cathy Bissoon

United States District Judge
cc (via First-Class U.S. Mail): Kyle Seidel
Fayette County Prison
12 Court Street
Uniontown, PA 15401-3587


Summaries of

Seidel v. Bennett

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 21, 2015
Civil Action No. 15-23 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 21, 2015)
Case details for

Seidel v. Bennett

Case Details

Full title:KYLE SEIDEL, Plaintiff, v. CHRIS BENNETT, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jul 21, 2015

Citations

Civil Action No. 15-23 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 21, 2015)