From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seid v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 12, 2016
No. 69554 (Nev. Feb. 12, 2016)

Opinion

No. 69554

02-12-2016

SEID; AND ACE CAB, LLC, Petitioners, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE KERRY LOUISE EARLEY, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and ANNA VASILYEVA, Real Party in Interest.


ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying summary judgment in a tort action.

Having considered the petition and supporting documents, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not warranted. NRS 34.170; Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004) (holding that an appeal is generally an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 113 Nev. 1343, 1344, 950 P.2d "280, 281 (1997) (noting that this court will generally not consider writ petitions challenging orders denying motions to dismiss or for summary judgment). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Parraguirre /s/_________, J.
Douglas /s/_________, J.
Cherry cc: Hon. Kerry Louise Earley, District Judge

Frias Transportation Management

Chad A. Bowers, Ltd.

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Seid v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 12, 2016
No. 69554 (Nev. Feb. 12, 2016)
Case details for

Seid v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State

Case Details

Full title:SEID; AND ACE CAB, LLC, Petitioners, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 12, 2016

Citations

No. 69554 (Nev. Feb. 12, 2016)