From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seibert v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 16, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-10 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 16, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-10

09-16-2019

MICHAEL SEIBERT, Plaintiff v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 2019, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 16) of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson, recommending that the court vacate the decision of the administrative law judge denying the application of Michael Seibert ("Seibert") for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income, and it appearing that the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") has not objected to the report, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2), and the court noting that failure of a party to timely object to a magistrate judge's conclusions "may result in forfeiture of de novo review at the district court level," Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878-79 (3d Cir. 1987)), but that, as a matter of good practice, a district court should afford "reasoned consideration" to the uncontested portions of the report, E.E.O.C. v. City of Long Branch, 866 F.3d 93, 100 (3d Cir. 2017) (quoting Henderson, 812 F.2d at 879), in order to "satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes, and, following an independent review of the record, the court being in agreement with Judge Carlson's recommendation, and concluding that there is no clear error on the face of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The report (Doc. 16) of Magistrate Judge Carlson is ADOPTED.

2. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Seibert and against the Commissioner as set forth in the following paragraph.

3. The Commissioner's decision is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner with instructions to conduct a new administrative hearing, develop the record fully, and evaluate the evidence appropriately in accordance with this order and the report (Doc. 16) of Magistrate Judge Carlson.

4. The Clerk of Court shall thereafter CLOSE this case.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Seibert v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 16, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-10 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 16, 2019)
Case details for

Seibert v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SEIBERT, Plaintiff v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Sep 16, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-10 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 16, 2019)

Citing Cases

Pendergast v. Kizakazi

, No. 1:18-CV-10, 2019 WL 4420578 (M.D. Pa. Sept. 16, 2019) (reversing and remanding ALJ's unfavorable…

Amy P. v. Kijakazi

Therefore, even setting aside the sixteen to eighteen trigger points noted by Dr. Weiss and the…