From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sehnert v. New York City Transit Auth.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 3, 2012
95 A.D.3d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Summary

In Sehnert plaintiff alleged that the cause of her injuries was a piece of metal protruding from the sidewalk that she contended was a signpost that was installed and removed by the City.

Summary of this case from Dendy v. City of New York

Opinion

2012-05-3

Barbara SEHNERT, et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents–Appellants, v. The NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, et al., Defendants,City of New York, Defendant–Respondent,Broadway Tenth Property LLC, et al., Defendants–Appellants.[And a Third Party Action].

Hodgson Russ, LLP, New York (Margaret M. Cmielewski of counsel), for appellants. The Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Firm, LLP, New York (Leslie D. Kelmachter of counsel), for respondents-appellants.


Hodgson Russ, LLP, New York (Margaret M. Cmielewski of counsel), for appellants. The Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Firm, LLP, New York (Leslie D. Kelmachter of counsel), for respondents-appellants.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Ronald E. Sternberg of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stallman, J.), entered January 24, 2011, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability as against defendant City of New York, denied defendants Broadway Tenth Property LLC and Ernest Realty Associates, LLC's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, and granted the City's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff Barbara Sehnert allegedly sustained injuries after exiting a bus and tripping and falling over a piece of metal protruding from the sidewalk. Plaintiffs contend that the piece of metal was a broken signpost that the City installed and removed. However, as they concede, they submitted no evidence that established that the piece of metal was a sign or signpost installed or removed by the City and thus failed to show that the City caused or created the alleged sidewalk defect. Nor did they show that the City had prior written notice of the alleged defect ( see Administrative Code of City of N.Y. § 7–201 [c][2] ).

Defendants Broadway Tenth and Ernest Realty, as the owners of property abutting the public sidewalk, may be held liable in negligence for injuries resulting from sidewalk defects ( see Administrative Code § 7–210[a]; § 19–101[d]; Early v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 73 A.D.3d 559, 904 N.Y.S.2d 367 [2010]; Lockard v. Sopolsky, 82 A.D.3d 657, 920 N.Y.S.2d 46 [2011] ). The cases on which defendants rely in support of their argument to the contrary involve accidents that occurred before September 2003, the effective date of *872 Administrative Code § 7–210(a) ( see Early, 73 A.D.3d at 560, 904 N.Y.S.2d 367).

TOM, J.P., ANDRIAS, DeGRASSE, RICHTER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sehnert v. New York City Transit Auth.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 3, 2012
95 A.D.3d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

In Sehnert plaintiff alleged that the cause of her injuries was a piece of metal protruding from the sidewalk that she contended was a signpost that was installed and removed by the City.

Summary of this case from Dendy v. City of New York
Case details for

Sehnert v. New York City Transit Auth.

Case Details

Full title:Barbara SEHNERT, et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents–Appellants, v. The NEW…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 3, 2012

Citations

95 A.D.3d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3532
942 N.Y.S.2d 871

Citing Cases

Dendy v. City of New York

The City and plaintiff, both argue in opposition that 605 West has failed to meet its prima facie burden in…