Opinion
3:14-CV-01433-PK
02-02-2017
SUBRINA POUPAK SEHAT, Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE UNIVERSAL INSURANCE, COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
BROWN, Judge.
Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. issued Findings and Recommendation (#219) on November 22, 2016, in which he recommends this Court grant Defendant Washington County Sheriff's Department's (WCSO) Motion (#201) to Dismiss, grant Defendant Ryan Corbridge's Motion (#203) to Dismiss, grant Defendant Progressive Universal Insurance Company of Illinois's Motion (#211) to Dismiss, and dismiss this matter with prejudice. Plaintiff filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F. 3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
This Court has carefully considered Plaintiff's Objections and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court also has reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation (#219). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS WSCO's Motion (#201) to Dismiss, GRANTS Ryan Corbridge's Motion (#203) to Dismiss, GRANTS Progressive's Motion (#211) to Dismiss, and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 2nd day of February, 2017.
/s/_________
ANNA J. BROWN
United States District Judge