From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Segura v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Apr 9, 2014
NO. 09-13-00457-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 9, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 09-13-00457-CR

04-09-2014

DAVID EARL SEGURA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 12-14198


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant David Earl Segura entered a plea of guilty to the offense of aggravated robbery. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 29.03(a)(3)(A) (West 2011). The trial court found the evidence sufficient to find Segura guilty, but deferred finding him guilty. The trial court placed Segura on community supervision for ten years and assessed a fine of $1,000. The State subsequently filed a motion to revoke Segura's community supervision. Segura pled "true" to violating a condition of his community supervision. After a hearing on the State's motion to revoke, the trial court found that Segura violated a condition of his community supervision order, found Segura guilty of aggravated robbery, revoked Segura's unadjudicated community supervision, and imposed a sentence of thirty-five years of confinement.

Segura's appellate counsel filed an Anders brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). Counsel's brief presents his professional evaluation of the record and concludes there are no arguable grounds to be advanced in this appeal. Counsel provided Segura with a copy of this brief. We granted an extension of time for appellant to file a pro se brief. We received no response from Segura.

We have independently reviewed the clerk's record and the reporter's record, and we agree with Segura's appellate counsel that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief Segura's appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment.

Segura may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.

AFFIRMED.

______________

CHARLES KREGER

Justice
Do not publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger, and Johnson, JJ.


Summaries of

Segura v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Apr 9, 2014
NO. 09-13-00457-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 9, 2014)
Case details for

Segura v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID EARL SEGURA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Apr 9, 2014

Citations

NO. 09-13-00457-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 9, 2014)