Segura v. Block

2 Citing cases

  1. Lopez-Flores v. Douglas Cnty.

    Case No. 6:19-cv-00904-AA (D. Or. May. 30, 2020)   Cited 2 times
    Finding Lopez-Lopez unpersuasive and holding that "even if there were sufficient communication [between ICE and state officials] to impute probable cause, defendants would not have authority to detain plaintiff as there was no formal agreement allowing them to do so"

    Id. at 694. Plaintiff alleges that Sheriff Hanlin, a county employee, acted "pursuant to a formal governmental policy or a longstanding practice or custom which constitutes the standing operating procedure of the local governmental entity," Gillette v. Delmore, 972 F.2d 1342, 1346 (9th Cir. 1992) (internal quotations and citations omitted), violating plaintiff's constitutional right to be free from unlawful seizure guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment. Plaintiff further alleges that the Jail has a "practice, policy, or custom of detaining inmates, solely due to the existence of an immigration detainer," regardless of whether they have probable cause to extend plaintiff's detention after she posted bail.

  2. Mike Rose's Auto Body, Inc. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co.

    389 F. Supp. 3d 687 (N.D. Cal. 2019)   Cited 3 times

    There was no ambiguity to clarify. The Ninth Circuit's decision in San Diego AFL-CIO Bus Drivers Local Div. 1309 of Amalgamated Transit Union v. San Diego Transit Corp. , 972 F.2d 1342 (9th Cir. 1992) (Table), although unpublished, is instructive. In San Diego , the arbitration board issued a final award, then superseded it with a "corrected" award.