Opinion
Civil No. 13-cv-095-JNL-LM
12-10-2013
Mary Seguin v. Hon. Paul Suttell, et al.
ORDER
Plaintiff's motions: to convene a grand jury (doc. nos. 76 and 96); to change venue, to recuse the New Hampshire bench, and to vacate all orders issued by the magistrate judge (doc. nos. 78, 88, 90, and 95); and to strike a local rule (doc. no. 89), are all DENIED for reasons stated in this court's prior rulings, see Orders (doc. nos. 19, 61, 71, 72, and 86), and for additional reasons stated in the Oct. 17, 2013, order (doc. no. 157) in Seguin v. Textron, No. 13-cv-12-SJM-LM (D.R.I.). This court notes that the court in Seguin v. Textron, No. 13-cv-12-SJM-LM (D.R.I.), has denied essentially the same motions and requests for relief. See Endorsed Order (Nov. 7, 2013), in Seguin v. Textron, No. 13-cv-12-SJM-LM (D.R.I.). Plaintiff's motion to take judicial notice of Patrice Livingston's declaration and exhibits (doc. no. 97), is GRANTED IN PART, to the extent that the court takes notice that the declaration and exhibits, docketed in this case as Document No. 81, in fact exist, but the court does not credit as true the contents of those documents, or plaintiff's characterization of their significance. The motion (doc. no. 97) is DENIED in all other respects.
SO ORDERED.
_____________________
Landya McCafferty
United States Magistrate Judge
cc: Mary Seguin, pro se
Rebecca Tedford Partington, Esq.
Susan E. Urso, Esq.
LBM:nmd