Opinion
No. 05-04-00551-CR
Opinion Filed June 21, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court, No. 3, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F00-00576-NJ. Affirmed.
Before Justices MORRIS, LANG, and MAZZANT.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In this case, Fortino Andres Segovia appeals his conviction for aggravated sexual assault. Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere in exchange for five years deferred adjudication community supervision and a $500 fine. During the term of community supervision, the State moved to proceed with adjudication of appellant's guilt. After appellant entered pleas of true to violating four conditions of community supervision, the trial court adjudicated him guilty, revoked his community supervision, and assessed punishment at eighteen years confinement. On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant, however, did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.