Segler v. Felfam Ltd. Partnership

Full title: SYLVIA A. SEGLER, Plaintiff, v. FELFAM LTD. PARTNERSHIP, LEVY, MORSE…

Court: United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Oct 14, 2008

Civil Action No. 08-cv-02136-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 14, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-cv-02136-BNB.

October 14, 2008

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO PROCEED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915

BOYD BOLAND, Magistrate Judge

Plaintiff has filed pro se a Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and a Complaint. The motion and affidavit indicate that Plaintiff should be granted leave to proceed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 solely on the basis of inability to prepay fees or give security therefor. Accordingly it is

ORDERED that the Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 is granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the court will review the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) to determine if the complaint is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that process shall not issue until further order of the court. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to amend that Plaintiff filed on October 2, 2008, is denied as unnecessary because the October 2, 2008, order to cure, which apparently crossed in the mail, directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint, which she did on October 9, 2008.