From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Segal v. Strausser Enterprises, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 7, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-4647 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 7, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-4647.

October 7, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 7th day of October, 2010, upon consideration of the following motions:

(1) Defendants Strausser Enterprises, Inc. and Gary Strausser's Motion to Quash Plaintiffs' Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued to Nick Azzolina and Motion for Protective Order (Docket No. 125) filed March 9, 2010;
(2) Defendants Strausser Enterprises, Inc. and Gary Strausser's Motion to Quash Plaintiffs' Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued to Lafayette Ambassador Bank and Motion for Protective Order (Docket No. 126) filed March 9, 2010;
(3) Defendants Strausser Enterprises, Inc. and Gary Strausser's Motion to Quash Plaintiffs' Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued to Salvatore J. Panto, Jr. and Motion for Protective Order (Docket No. 127) filed March 9, 2010;
(4) Defendants Strausser Enterprises, Inc. and Gary Strausser's Motion to Quash Plaintiffs' Subpoena Duces Tecum to Gross McGinley, LLP, Motion to Stay Enforcement of the Subpoena, and Motion for Protective Order (Docket No. 165) filed June 3, 2010;

upon consideration of plaintiffs' responses thereto; and for the reasons expressed in the foregoing Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED that defendants' motions to quash are GRANTED in part. The subpoenas served upon Nick Azzolina, Lafayette Ambassador Bank, Salvatore J. Panto, Jr. and Gross McGinley, LLP. shall be limited to the disclosure of documents pertaining to Strausser Enterprises, Inc. only for the time period of January 1, 2005 through January 1, 2008.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the documents produced in response to these subpoenas and the information contained therein shall be protected against unauthorized disclosure. Plaintiffs and their counsel shall not disclose the documents or their contents to any non-party and shall not use them for any commercial advantage, and shall limit their use to this litigation only.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all requests for sanctions are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' request for stay of enforcement of the subpoena issued to Gross McGinley, LLP is DISMISSED as moot.


Summaries of

Segal v. Strausser Enterprises, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 7, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-4647 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 7, 2010)
Case details for

Segal v. Strausser Enterprises, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH SEGAL, et al Plaintiffs v. STRAUSSER ENTERPRISES, INC., et al…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 7, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-4647 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 7, 2010)