From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Segal v. Purofied Down Products Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 20, 1962
15 A.D.2d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Opinion

March 20, 1962


Order entered on December 15, 1961, granting plaintiff's motion for an examination before trial to perpetuate his own testimony and denying defendant's cross motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant, the motion denied and the cross motion to dismiss the complaint granted. In this action for damages based on an alleged breach of a contract of employment, plaintiff failed to serve and file a note of issue and proceed with the action, except for the instant motion to perpetuate testimony, for what appears to be about 3 1/2 years since the adjournment without date of the examination of defendant commenced in March, 1958. Five years and nine months elapsed between the commencement of this action and the cross motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution. On this record plaintiff has failed to explain the unreasonable neglect to prosecute this action. ( Gallagher v. Clafington, Inc., 7 A.D.2d 627. )

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.


Summaries of

Segal v. Purofied Down Products Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 20, 1962
15 A.D.2d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)
Case details for

Segal v. Purofied Down Products Corporation

Case Details

Full title:MOE SEGAL, Respondent, v. PUROFIED DOWN PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 20, 1962

Citations

15 A.D.2d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)