From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Segal v. Lederer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 27, 2012
Case No. 2:12-cv-00601-LRH-GWF (D. Nev. Apr. 27, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-00601-LRH-GWF

04-27-2012

STEVE SEGAL, NICK HAMMER, ROBIN HOUGDAHL and TODD TERRY, individually an on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. HOWARD LEDERER and CHRIS FERGUSON, Defendants.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' failure to file a Certificate as to Interested Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The Complaint (#1) in this matter was filed April 12, 2012. LR 7.1-1 requires that counsel for private parties shall, upon entering a case, file a certificate as to interested parties, listing all persons, firms, partnerships or corporations, known to have an interest in the outcome of the case, including the names of all parent subsidiary, affiliate and/or insider of the named non-individual parties. If there are no known interested parties, other than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect must be filed. To date, Plaintiffs have failed to comply. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file their Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than May 2, 2012. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.

_______________

GEORGE FOLEY, JR.

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Segal v. Lederer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 27, 2012
Case No. 2:12-cv-00601-LRH-GWF (D. Nev. Apr. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Segal v. Lederer

Case Details

Full title:STEVE SEGAL, NICK HAMMER, ROBIN HOUGDAHL and TODD TERRY, individually an…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 27, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cv-00601-LRH-GWF (D. Nev. Apr. 27, 2012)