From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sefton v. Bd. Conservation and Development

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1926
132 A. 923 (N.J. 1926)

Opinion

Argued October 28, 1925 —

Decided February 1, 1926.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 101 N.J.L. 294, sub nomine Landell v. State.

For the appellant, Bleakly, Stockwell Burling.

For the respondents, Edward L. Katzenbach and John Milton.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Black in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Sefton v. Bd. Conservation and Development

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1926
132 A. 923 (N.J. 1926)
Case details for

Sefton v. Bd. Conservation and Development

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK SEFTON, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT ET…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 1, 1926

Citations

132 A. 923 (N.J. 1926)
132 A. 923