From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SEFI FABRICATORS, INC. v. TILLIM

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Nov 20, 1973
79 Misc. 2d 213 (N.Y. App. Term 1973)

Opinion

November 20, 1973

Appeal from the District Court of Suffolk County, JOHN V. VAUGHN, J.

Roseman Roseman ( Gilbert Roseman of counsel), for appellant.

Leonard L. Horn for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

Plaintiff, a construction company, instituted this breach of contract action against defendant, an attorney, alleging, in substance, that because it relied on defendant's representation that his client would pay plaintiff an amount due it upon the disposition of a case then pending in Federal court between defendant's client and other parties, it had refrained from proceeding with an action it had commenced and thereby suffered damage.

Since a contract made by an attorney in behalf of his client is the act of a known principal, and imposes no personal liability on the attorney in the absence of an express agreement to that effect (3 N.Y. Jur. Attorney and Client, § 80; Mencher v. Weiss, 306 N.Y. 1), as a known principal he is not liable unless he has assumed a personal liability in clear and unmistakable language ( Title Guar. Trust Co. v. Sage, 146 App. Div. 578), and he is not liable to third persons for the acts of his client unless it can be shown convincingly that he was guilty of fraud, collusion or a malicious or tortious act (3 N.Y. Jur., Attorney and Client, § 78). In the absence of any allegation that defendant either advised or induced his client not to pay plaintiff ( Kasen v. Morrell, 18 Misc.2d 158), that he induced his client to breach a contract with plaintiff or commit a legal wrong ( Hornstein v. Podwitz, 254 N.Y. 443, 449), or that he made an absolute promise to plaintiff that the alleged debt would, in fact, be paid ( Kail v. Department of Public Welfare of County of Westchester, 62 Misc.2d 302), it is our opinion that the complaint fails to state a cause of action.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs.

Concur — HOGAN, P.J., McCULLOUGH and FARLEY, JJ.


Summaries of

SEFI FABRICATORS, INC. v. TILLIM

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Nov 20, 1973
79 Misc. 2d 213 (N.Y. App. Term 1973)
Case details for

SEFI FABRICATORS, INC. v. TILLIM

Case Details

Full title:SEFI FABRICATORS, INC., Appellant, v. MALCOLM L. TILLIM, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Nov 20, 1973

Citations

79 Misc. 2d 213 (N.Y. App. Term 1973)
360 N.Y.S.2d 146

Citing Cases

Friedman v. Dozorc

In addition to the canons enforced by the licensing agencies or integrated bar, the attorney is responsible…

Wallace, Saunders, Austin, Brown & Enochs v. Rahm

Accordingly, as the agent of his or her client, an attorney is not personally liable under a contract entered…