From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sefel v. Mizzaro's Restaurant, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 16, 1998
251 A.D.2d 130 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 16, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.).


We decline to disturb the motion court's exercise of discretion in denying defendant's motion for summary judgment on the ground that it was made more than 31 days after the filing of the note of issue, in violation of the court's preliminary conference order (CPLR 3212 [a]), and note that defendant did not seek leave of the court to make this untimely motion for good cause shown. We have considered defendant's other arguments and find that they do not warrant any modification of the orders.

Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Sefel v. Mizzaro's Restaurant, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 16, 1998
251 A.D.2d 130 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Sefel v. Mizzaro's Restaurant, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MICHALINA SEFEL, Respondent, v. MIZZARO'S RESTAURANT, INC., Doing Business…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 16, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 130 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
672 N.Y.S.2d 737