From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seely v. Urdahl

Court of Appeals of Iowa
Jul 14, 2010
No. 0-399 / 09-1640 (Iowa Ct. App. Jul. 14, 2010)

Opinion

No. 0-399 / 09-1640

Filed July 14, 2010

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cerro Gordo County, Paul W. Riffell, Judge.

The plaintiffs appeal from the district court's order dismissing their petition for writ of mandamus. AFFIRMED.

Julie Seely, Thornton, appellant pro se.

William Plymat, Thornton, appellant pro se.

Paul Martin, County Attorney, Mason City, for appellees.

Considered by VOGEL, P.J., and POTTERFIELD and DANILSON, JJ.


[EDITORS' NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN DETERMINED. THE PRECEDENTIAL VALUE OF CASES WHICH ARE NOT YET PUBLISHED IS GOVERNED BY IOWA CT. R. 6.14 (5).]


The plaintiffs' petition for writ of mandamus was dismissed by the district court for failure to properly serve the defendants with original notice of the proceedings as required by Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 1.302. Finding the district court correct in its ruling, we affirm pursuant to Iowa Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.1203.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Seely v. Urdahl

Court of Appeals of Iowa
Jul 14, 2010
No. 0-399 / 09-1640 (Iowa Ct. App. Jul. 14, 2010)
Case details for

Seely v. Urdahl

Case Details

Full title:JULIE A. SEELY and WILLIAM N. PLYMAT, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JAY…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa

Date published: Jul 14, 2010

Citations

No. 0-399 / 09-1640 (Iowa Ct. App. Jul. 14, 2010)