Opinion
12334-23L
08-05-2024
JENNIFER CHRISTINA SEEKAMP, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
ORDER
Emin Toro, Judge
This collection due process (CDP) case is currently calendared for trial during the Court's September 30, 2024, Portland, Oregon, trial session. On August 1, 2024, respondent filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 24)
Respondent's Motion asserts that no trial is necessary in this case because no relevant facts remain in dispute. The Motion contends that, on the basis of the undisputed facts, the case should be decided in respondent's favor. The Court will order petitioner Jennifer Christina Seekamp to file a response to respondent's Motion. If petitioner disagrees with any facts set out in paragraphs 9-29 of respondent's Motion, then her response should point out the specific facts in dispute. Petitioner's response should state, by reference to the relevant numbered paragraph in respondent's Motion, any assertion with which she disagrees, should explain the reason for her disagreement, and should cite whatever evidence supports her position. If petitioner disagrees with respondent's argument as to the law, then her response should also set out her position on the disputed legal issues. Q&As that the Court has prepared on the subject "What is a motion for summary judgment? How should I respond to one?" are available at the Court's website and are printed on the page attached to this Order. If petitioner is unsure how to proceed, she should promptly initiate a telephone conference with the Court and respondent by placing a call to the Chambers Administrator of the undersigned judge at (202) 521-0760.
Petitioner should note that Tax Court Rule 121(d) provides: "If the nonmovant party [i.e., Jennifer Christina Seekamp] does not so respond [to a motion for summary judgment], a decision may be entered against that party." Upon due consideration, it is hereby
ORDERED that, no later than September 4, 2024, petitioner shall file with the Court and serve on respondent a response to respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment. It is further
ORDERED that, no later than September 16, 2024, respondent shall file with the Court and serve on petitioner a reply to petitioner's response (or, if petitioner has failed to file and serve a response, then respondent shall file a status report).
What is a motion for summary judgment? How should I respond to one? The motion. A motion for summary judgment requests a ruling from a judge on some or all of the issues in a case before trial. If a motion for summary judgment is filed, the judge will review the documents submitted by the parties and consider whether the case can be decided without a trial. The party filing the motion must show that there is no genuine dispute of any important fact and that the party filing the motion is entitled to judgment in their favor as a matter of law. See Rule 121.
Your response. If the Court orders you to file a response to a motion for summary judgment, your response must: specify which factual statements in the motion for summary judgment you dispute, state what you contend the actual facts are, and cite the specific evidence that you rely on to support your factual contentions. That is, you must do more than deny or disagree with the motion. Instead, you must set forth specific facts that establish there is a factual dispute and that a trial is necessary to resolve that dispute. It is not enough merely to claim that a fact is in dispute. You must support your claim that there is a question about a material fact (or facts) by submitting with your response the evidence on which you rely.
Your evidence. Your supporting evidence may include your own sworn affidavit or unsworn declaration given under penalty of perjury. (Form 18, Unsworn Declaration under Penalty of Perjury). Your declaration can state facts about which you have personal knowledge. If your evidence includes documents, then you should submit those with your response (preferably numbered as Exhibits), and your declaration should identify and authenticate those documents. Your supporting evidence may also include other affidavits, stipulations, admissions, answers to interrogatories, or deposition transcripts.
Legal disputes. A motion for summary judgment may involve not only factual disputes but also legal disputes. If you disagree with the IRS's explanation of the law that applies to your case, you should explain your disagreement and cite the statutes, regulations, or other authorities that apply to your case.
Failure to respond. If the IRS files a motion for summary judgment in your case and the Court orders you to file a response, then your failure to file a response may be grounds for granting the motion. See Rules 121(d) and 123(b).
Results of summary judgment. If a motion for summary judgment is granted in favor of the IRS, then there will be no trial, and a judgment will be entered against you. Similarly, if you file a motion for summary judgment and it is granted, then there will be no trial, and a judgment will be entered in your favor.