From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seehase v. Webster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 17, 1954
284 App. Div. 1028 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Opinion

November 17, 1954.

Present — McCurn, P.J., Kimball. Piper, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ. [See 285 App. Div. 859.]


Order reversed on the law and facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. Memorandum: We do not feel that adequate reasons or excuses were given to justify the delay and the opening of the default in this matter. If rules of practice mean anything, they should be observed. The opinion of the late Supreme Court Justice ROBERT H. JACKSON, in Knickerbocker Print. Corp. v. United States (N.Y.L.J., Sept. 10, 1954, p. 1, col. 1) is particularly applicable here. It reads as follows: "When more business becomes concentrated in one firm than it can handle, it has two obvious remedies: to put on more legal help, or let some of the business go to offices which have time to attend to it. I doubt if any court should be a party to encouraging the accumulation of more business in one law office than it can attend to in due time." All concur. (Appeal from an order granting plaintiff's motion to open his default and restore the action to the trial calendar.)


Summaries of

Seehase v. Webster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 17, 1954
284 App. Div. 1028 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)
Case details for

Seehase v. Webster

Case Details

Full title:HARRY T. SEEHASE, Respondent, v. HELEN K. WEBSTER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 17, 1954

Citations

284 App. Div. 1028 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Citing Cases

Silverberg v. Campana

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without prejudice, however, to a timely…

Seehase v. Webster

On reargument, order of Special Term reversed on the law and facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and…