From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seefeldt v. California Forensic Medical Group

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 14, 2011
No. CIV S-09-2576 CMK (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-2576 CMK (TEMP) P.

January 14, 2011


ORDER


By order filed April 28, 2010, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. Plaintiff has consented to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

DATED: January 13, 2011


Summaries of

Seefeldt v. California Forensic Medical Group

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 14, 2011
No. CIV S-09-2576 CMK (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Seefeldt v. California Forensic Medical Group

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN SEEFELDT, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 14, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-09-2576 CMK (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2011)