From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sedore v. Washington

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Apr 3, 2024
No. 23-10647 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 3, 2024)

Opinion

23-10647

04-03-2024

SCOTT SEDORE, Plaintiff, v. HEIDI WASHINGTON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 56)

JONATHAN J.C. GREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pro se plaintiff Scott Sedore filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit against numerous defendants, alleging violations of his Eighth Amendment rights and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. (ECF No. 1, PageID.4-6, 9-11.) This matter comes before the Court on Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris' Report and Recommendation dated November 13, 2023 (the “R&R”) (ECF No. 56) related to Sedore's motion for default judgment against defendant Doctor Charles Jamsen. (ECF No. 43) In the R&R, Magistrate Judge Morris recommends that the Court deny Sedore's motions for default judgment. (Id.) Sedore did not file an objection to the R&R.

The Court has had an opportunity to review this matter and finds that the Magistrate Judge reached the correct conclusions for the proper reasons in the R&R.

Finding no error in the Magistrate Judge's November 13, 2023 Report and Recommendation, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 56) in its entirety.

For the reasons stated above, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation dated November 13, 2023 (ECF No. 56) is ADOPTED as this Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sedore v. Washington

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Apr 3, 2024
No. 23-10647 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 3, 2024)
Case details for

Sedore v. Washington

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT SEDORE, Plaintiff, v. HEIDI WASHINGTON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Apr 3, 2024

Citations

No. 23-10647 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 3, 2024)