From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sedina V. L. v. Markis R. C.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 28, 2021
198 A.D.3d 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

14507 Dkt. Nos. V-01022/21, V-01023/21 Case No. 2021–00775

10-28-2021

In the Matter of SEDINA V. L., Petitioner–Respondent, v. MARKIS R. C., Respondent–Appellant.

Larry S. Bachner, New York, for appellant. Carol L. Kahn, New York, for respondent. Kenneth M. Tuccillo, Hastings on Hudson, attorney for the children.


Larry S. Bachner, New York, for appellant.

Carol L. Kahn, New York, for respondent.

Kenneth M. Tuccillo, Hastings on Hudson, attorney for the children.

Renwick, J.P., Gonza´lez, Kennedy, Scarpulla, Rodriguez, JJ.

Order, Family Court, New York County (Jonathan Shim, J.), entered on or about March 5, 2021, which granted the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Application by respondent father's assigned counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 [1967] ; People v. Saunders, 52 A.D.2d 833, 384 N.Y.S.2d 161 [1st Dept. 1976] ). A review of the record demonstrates that there are no nonfrivolous issues that could be raised on this appeal. The writ of habeas corpus was issued to recognize and enforce a temporary order of the Arizona court awarding the mother residential custody of the subject children (see Domestic Relations Law § 77–b ). Respondent appeared and participated in the hearing held by the Arizona court, thus submitting to the court's jurisdiction, and failed to provide any basis for New York to exercise emergency jurisdiction under Domestic Relations Law § 76–c. We note that the mother's request to strike portions of assigned counsel's brief is not properly before us since she did not move for such relief.


Summaries of

Sedina V. L. v. Markis R. C.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 28, 2021
198 A.D.3d 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Sedina V. L. v. Markis R. C.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SEDINA V. L., Petitioner–Respondent, v. MARKIS R. C.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 28, 2021

Citations

198 A.D.3d 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
153 N.Y.S.3d 842

Citing Cases

CAC Atl. v. Harmon Stores, Inc.

Defendant also asks to amend its answer to add a counterclaim for plaintiff's breach of the implied covenant…

AKF Inc. v. Polonez Parcel Serv.

Last, petitioner asks to compel disclosure in aid of the arbitration, C.P.L.R. § 3102(c), but the order to…