From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sedillo v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 25, 2019
Case No. CV 16-1382 DSF (JC) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. CV 16-1382 DSF (JC)

03-25-2019

JULIAN SEDILLO, Petitioner, v. W.L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has conducted the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636 and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge reflected in the November 29, 2018 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that (1) the operative First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody is denied on the merits; (2) this action is dismissed with prejudice; and (3) Judgment shall be entered accordingly. /// /// ///

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, and the Judgment herein on petitioner and counsel for respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 25, 2019

/s/_________

HONORABLE DALE S. FISCHER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sedillo v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 25, 2019
Case No. CV 16-1382 DSF (JC) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2019)
Case details for

Sedillo v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:JULIAN SEDILLO, Petitioner, v. W.L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 25, 2019

Citations

Case No. CV 16-1382 DSF (JC) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2019)