From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Securities Exchange Commission v. Queri

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 6, 2009
08cv1367 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 6, 2009)

Opinion

08cv1367.

March 6, 2009


ORDER OF COURT


After careful consideration of the SEC's Motion to Strike Defendants England and Jerome's Affirmative Defenses (doc. no. 64) and defendants response thereto, the Court will GRANT the motion to the following extent: Defendants England and Jerome's 3rd affirmative defense raising defenses of subject matter and personal jurisdiction will be stricken, consistent with this Court's Order of January 26, 2009, denying defendants' motion to dismiss. Similarly, the Court agrees with the SEC that venue is proper in this district, and therefore Defendants England and Jerome's 4th affirmative defenses challenging venue will be stricken. Defendants' 9th defense is duplicative, and also will be stricken.

Otherwise, the Court DENIES the SEC's Motion to Strike Defendants England and Jerome's Affirmative Defenses (doc. no. 64) without prejudice to raising the issues at an appropriate time following discovery.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Securities Exchange Commission v. Queri

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 6, 2009
08cv1367 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 6, 2009)
Case details for

Securities Exchange Commission v. Queri

Case Details

Full title:SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff(s), v. JOSEPH J. QUERI, JR.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 6, 2009

Citations

08cv1367 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 6, 2009)