Opinion
CASE NO: 8:09-cv-87-T-26TBM.
June 24, 2010
ORDER
Upon due consideration of the parties' submissions, together with the procedural history of this case and the previous orders of this Court vesting authority in the Receiver to identify and recover assets fraudulently acquired for the benefit of the Receivership Entities and the defrauded investors, and consistent with the recent order denying a similar motion for protective order entered by United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Pizzo on June 23, 2010, in Wiand v. Rowe, case number 10-cv-245-T-17MAP, it is ordered and adjudged that the Rowes' Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. 416) is denied. The Court concludes, as pointed out by Plaintiff in its response, that "[t]he Receiver is applying routine discovery tools and exceptional diligence to develop the evidence necessary to protect and recover investors' money." The hearing on the motion scheduled for June 25, 2010, is cancelled.
DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida.