From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Securities Exchange Comm. v. Great Amer. Technol

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 15, 2009
07 Civ. 10694 (DC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 15, 2009)

Opinion

07 Civ. 10694 (DC).

May 15, 2009


ORDER


The Court held a conference in this case today and ruled as follows:

(1) Defendant Vincent Setteducate shall meet his obligations to his attorney, Martin Stolar, by May 29, 2009. If he fails to do so, Mr. Stolar's application to withdraw as counsel will be granted, and Mr. Setteducate will be required to proceed pro se. Mr. Stolar shall forward a copy of this Order to Mr. Setteducate.

(2) Mr. Setteducate shall respond — either through counsel orpro se — to all of plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission's ("SEC") outstanding discovery requests by June 19, 2009.

(3) The motion by the SEC for a default judgment against defendant Great American Technologies, Inc. ("GAT") is denied as moot, as GAT is now represented by counsel.

(4) GAT shall provide initial disclosures to the SEC and respond to all outstanding discovery requests by June 5, 2009.

(5) All discovery, fact and expert, shall be completed by October 2, 2009. The Court will hold a conference that same day at 10:00 a.m.

(6) The conference scheduled for July 10, 2009 is cancelled.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Securities Exchange Comm. v. Great Amer. Technol

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 15, 2009
07 Civ. 10694 (DC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 15, 2009)
Case details for

Securities Exchange Comm. v. Great Amer. Technol

Case Details

Full title:SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. GREAT AMERICAN…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 15, 2009

Citations

07 Civ. 10694 (DC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 15, 2009)

Citing Cases

Securities Exchange Com. v. Great A. Technologies

The Court entered a default against Mr. Sette on December 15, 2009. See SEC v. Great American Technologies,…

Chen v. Y Cafe N.Y.C. Inc.

Further, although defense counsel has represented that the individual defendant is willing to proceed pro se…