From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Tang

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Feb 10, 2010
CV-09-05146 JCS (N.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2010)

Opinion

          Jennifer D. Brandt, Texas Bar No. 00796242, Jason C. Rodgers, Texas Bar No. 24005540, Securities and Exchange Commission, Forth Wirth District Office, Forth Worth, TX, Attorney for Plaintiff.

          CHRISTOPHER J. CANNON, State Bar No. 88034, Sugarman & Cannon, San Francisco, CA, Attorney for Defendant JOSEPH SETO.


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR ANSWER

          JOSEPH C. SPERO, Magistrate Judge.

         So the parties may focus on producing discovery and evaluating the case for settlement, the parties agree that the due date for the answer of defendant Joseph Seto will be moved from the current due date of February 16, 2010 until April 16, 2010.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Tang

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Feb 10, 2010
CV-09-05146 JCS (N.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2010)
Case details for

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Tang

Case Details

Full title:SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. KING CHUEN TANG a/k/a…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Feb 10, 2010

Citations

CV-09-05146 JCS (N.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2010)