From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Secrease v. Walker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 23, 2009
No. 2:09-cv-0299 JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2009)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-0299 JFM (HC).

November 23, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner has requested leave to file an opposition to respondent's August 17, 2009 motion to dismiss pursuant to the court's order of October 30, 2009. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The October 30, 2009 findings and recommendations (#33) are vacated.

2. Petitioner's November 3, 2009 application for leave to file an opposition to respondent's motion to dismiss (#34) is granted; Petitioner's November 3, 2009 opposition to respondent's motion to dismiss is deemed timely filed.

3. Respondent shall file a reply to petitioner's opposition within fifteen days from the date of this order.


Summaries of

Secrease v. Walker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 23, 2009
No. 2:09-cv-0299 JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2009)
Case details for

Secrease v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:SHANNON SECREASE, Petitioner, v. JAMES WALKER, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 23, 2009

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-0299 JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2009)