From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Secor v. Heyman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 8, 1924
123 Misc. 168 (N.Y. App. Term 1924)

Opinion

May 8, 1924.

Philip C. Samuels ( Philip C. Samuels and Max Lazarus, of counsel), for the appellants.

Abraham B. Keve, for the respondent.


In an action instituted by a firm of stockbrokers to recover against its customer the price of certain stock purchased on his behalf, the defendant's counsel in his summation to the jury said: "There is many a man sitting on the benches in the park because he lost his money down in Wall street." This remark was unwarranted and grossly prejudicial to plaintiffs' rights, and demands a reversal of the judgment and a new trial.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellants to abide the event.

WAGNER and WASSERVOGEL, JJ., concur; GUY, J., dissents.

Judgment reversed.


Summaries of

Secor v. Heyman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 8, 1924
123 Misc. 168 (N.Y. App. Term 1924)
Case details for

Secor v. Heyman

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE F. SECOR and Another, Appellants, v . MILLARD HEYMAN, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: May 8, 1924

Citations

123 Misc. 168 (N.Y. App. Term 1924)
206 N.Y.S. 348

Citing Cases

Drasner v. Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc.

See also, N.Y. Central R.R. Co. v. Johnson, 279 U.S. 310, 49 S.Ct. 300, 73 L.Ed. 706 (1929); 78 A.L.R. 1458,…