From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Secari v. Uchello

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Orleans
Oct 4, 1949
42 So. 2d 100 (La. Ct. App. 1949)

Opinion

No. 19401.

October 4, 1949.

APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF ORLEANS, LUTHER E. HALL, J.

George E. Konrad, Howell Carter, Jr., New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee.

James G. Schillin, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.


Appellee has moved to dismiss this appeal because of alleged insufficiency in the amount of the appeal bond. No effort was made by appellee in the trial court to call upon appellant to supplement the bond.

Since Act 112 of 1916 was adopted, an appeal may not be dismissed in the appellate court for the reason urged, unless the procedure prescribed in that statute was followed in the trial court. See Succession of Lissa, 194 La. 328, 193 So. 663; Durel v. Buchanan, 147 La. 804, 86 So. 189; Garland v. Keen, 18 La. App. 312, 137 So. 343.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is overruled.

Motion overruled.


Summaries of

Secari v. Uchello

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Orleans
Oct 4, 1949
42 So. 2d 100 (La. Ct. App. 1949)
Case details for

Secari v. Uchello

Case Details

Full title:SECARI v. UCHELLO

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Orleans

Date published: Oct 4, 1949

Citations

42 So. 2d 100 (La. Ct. App. 1949)

Citing Cases

Ray v. Marquez

As to the bond of appeal, if any defects exist therein no effort at all was made by the appellees in the…