From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Shustek

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 15, 2023
2:21-cv-01416-JCM-BNW (D. Nev. Feb. 15, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01416-JCM-BNW

02-15-2023

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL V. SHUSTEK and VESTIN MORTGAGE, LLC, Defendants.

SHEILA E. O'CALLAGHAN JOHN K. HAN DAVID ZHOU RUTH L. HAWLEY ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION MANUEL A. ABASCAL LATHAM & WATKINS LLP HUTCHISON & STEFFEN MARK A. HUTCHISON ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS MICHAEL V. SHUSTEK AND VESTIN MORTGAGE LLC


SHEILA E. O'CALLAGHAN

JOHN K. HAN

DAVID ZHOU

RUTH L. HAWLEY ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

MANUEL A. ABASCAL

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP HUTCHISON & STEFFEN MARK A. HUTCHISON

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS MICHAEL V. SHUSTEK AND VESTIN MORTGAGE LLC

JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY DISCOVERY AND ORDER MODIFYING CASE SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

BRENDA WEKSLER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“Plaintiff” or “SEC”) and Michael V. Shustek (“Mr. Shustek”) and Vestin Mortgage LLC (“Vestin Mortgage”, collectively “Defendants”) hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, on December 16, 2021, the Court entered an Order (ECF No. 12) setting deadlines for, inter alia, the disclosure of experts (August 8, 2022), disclosure of rebuttal experts (September 7, 2022), deadline to mediate (September 14, 2022), the close of fact discovery (October 7, 2022), the last day to file dispositive motions (November 7, 2022), and the pretrial order (January 27, 2023);

WHEREAS, on August 1, 2022, at the request of the SEC, the Court entered an Order (ECF No. 34) extending the deadlines for, inter alia, the disclosure of experts (February 6, 2023), disclosure of rebuttal experts (March 6, 2023), deadline to mediate (March 13, 2023), the close of fact discovery (April 5, 2023), the last day to file dispositive motions May 8, 2023), and the pretrial order (July 26, 2023);

WHEREAS, the Court has set the case for a settlement conference on March 7, 2023 (ECF Nos. 42 and 43);

WHEREAS, the parties believe it is in their best interests, and in the interest of efficiency and judicial economy, to permit sufficient time for the settlement discussions without simultaneously engaging in discovery, document productions or logging, and trial preparation; and potentially unnecessarily utilizing judicial resources;

WHEREAS, because the parties want to focus their efforts on settlement, they therefore request that the Court extend current deadlines for discovery to March 28, 2023, three weeks past the date of the settlement conference, and to re-set the other deadlines to take into account the proposed discovery stay;

WHEREAS, the parties propose that there be no changes to the current deadlines applicable to third parties governing the production of documents and the currently scheduled deadline for mediation of March 13, 2023;

WHEREAS, there is no trial date currently set in this case.

WHEREAS, this is the first joint request by the parties to adjust the discovery schedule and only the second overall request;

WHEREAS, the parties agree that good cause exists to stay discovery and continue the pretrial dates as follows:

Event

Current Date

Proposed New Date

Expert Disclosure Deadline

February 6, 2023

April 3, 2023

Expert Rebuttal Reports

March 6, 2023

May 1, 2023

Discovery Cut-Off

April 5, 2023

May 31,2023

Dispositive Motion Cut-Off

May 8, 2023

July 3, 2023

Filing of Pre-Trial Order

July 26, 2023

September 25, 2023

NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. Subject to the Court's approval, the parties agree to stay discovery and continue the currently scheduled pretrial dates as follows:

Event

Current Date

Proposed New Date

Expert Disclosure Deadline

February 6, 2023

April 3, 2023

Expert Rebuttal Reports

March 6, 2023

May 1, 2023

Discovery Cut-Off

April 5, 2023

May 31,2023

Dispositive Motion Cut-Off

May 8, 2023

July 3, 2023

Filing of Pre-Trial Order

July 26, 2023

September 25, 2023

2. The parties agree that the currently scheduled deadline for mediation of March 13, 2023 shall remain unchanged and is not impacted by this stipulation and proposed order.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that ECF No. 44 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part without prejudice. ECF No. 44 is granted to the extent the Court will stay discovery until March 28, 2023. ECF No. 44 is denied to the extent the Court will not extend discovery deadlines at this time, as the initial expert disclosure deadline ran and the parties have not shown excusable neglect for the late filing of this stipulation. See LR IA 6-1(a). The parties may refile their stipulation to extend discovery deadlines if they can show excusable neglect for the late filing.

Because discovery is stayed, ECF No. 21 is DENIED without prejudice to Plaintiff refiling this motion if the parties do not settle this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Shustek

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 15, 2023
2:21-cv-01416-JCM-BNW (D. Nev. Feb. 15, 2023)
Case details for

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Shustek

Case Details

Full title:SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL V. SHUSTEK and…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 15, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-01416-JCM-BNW (D. Nev. Feb. 15, 2023)