From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Mercury Interactive, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERNDISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 7, 2011
Case No. 3:07-cv-02822 WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:07-cv-02822 WHA

10-07-2011

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. MERCURY INTERACTIVE, LLC (F/K/MERCURY INTERACTIVE, INC.), AMNON LANDAN, SHARLENE ABRAMS, DOUGLAS SMITH and SUSAN SKAER, Defendants.

JAMES N. KRAMER JAMES A. MEYERS M. TODD SCOTT JENNIFER NEJAD ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LL JAMES A. MEYERS Attorneys for Defendant SUSAN SKAER FRANKLIN B. VELIE ( Admitted Pro Hac Vice ) ANDREW T. SOLOMON ( Admitted Pro Hac Vice ) SULLIVAN & WORCESTER LLP ANDREW T. SOLOMON Attorneys for Defendant AMNON LANDAN JEFFREY S. FACTER PATRICK D. ROBBINS EMILY V. GRIFFEN SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP PATRICK D. ROBBINS Attorneys for Defendant DOUGLAS SMITH A. DAVID WILLIAMS Attorney for Plaintiff SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


JAMES N. KRAMER (SBN 154709)

JAMES A. MEYERS (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE)

M. TODD SCOTT (SBN 226885)

JENNIFER NEJAD (SBN 267109)

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

SUSAN SKAER

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER REGARDING

DEPOSITIONS PURSUANT TO FED

R. CIV. PROC. 29

Judge: Honorable William Alsup

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 29, the above-named Plaintiff and Defendants (collectively, the "parties"), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, the parties seek to take more depositions than the limit of ten (10) provided per side pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 30;

WHEREAS, in its Initial Disclosures dated September 7, 2007, Plaintiff identified 85 individuals likely to have discoverable information that Plaintiff may use to support its claims;

WHEREAS, the parties agree and acknowledge that this is a complex matter involving three separately represented Defendants;

WHEREAS, the parties desire to have an opportunity to conduct depositions necessary and sufficient to adequately represent their respective interests;

NOW THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree, subject to the approval of the Court, that Defendants, collectively, on the one hand, and Plaintiff, on the other, are each entitled to forty (40) depositions in connection with this matter.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

JAMES N. KRAMER

JAMES A. MEYERS

M. TODD SCOTT

JENNIFER NEJAD

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LL

JAMES A. MEYERS

Attorneys for Defendant

SUSAN SKAER

FRANKLIN B. VELIE (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

ANDREW T. SOLOMON (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

SULLIVAN & WORCESTER LLP

ANDREW T. SOLOMON

Attorneys for Defendant

AMNON LANDAN

JEFFREY S. FACTER

PATRICK D. ROBBINS

EMILY V. GRIFFEN

SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP

PATRICK D. ROBBINS

Attorneys for Defendant

DOUGLAS SMITH

A. DAVID WILLIAMS

Attorney for Plaintiff

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

William Alsup

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Mercury Interactive, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERNDISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 7, 2011
Case No. 3:07-cv-02822 WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Mercury Interactive, LLC

Case Details

Full title:SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. MERCURY INTERACTIVE, LLC…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERNDISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 7, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:07-cv-02822 WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)