From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Lizhao Su

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Sep 14, 2023
No. 23-575 (2d Cir. Sep. 14, 2023)

Opinion

23-575

09-14-2023

Securities and Exchange Commission, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lizhao Su, Zhiqing Yin Relief Defendants-Appellants, Jun Qin, Yan Zhou, Bei Xie, Chaofeng Ji, Relief Defendants, Shaohua Michael Yin, Benjamin Bin Chow Defendants.

FOR RELIEF DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS: FRED A. ROWLEY, JR. (Matthew K. Donohue and Michael S. Sommer, on the brief), Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &Rosati, P.C., Los Angeles, CA, &New York, NY. FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE: PAUL G. ALVAREZ, Senior Appellate Counsel (Megan Barbero, General Counsel, and John W. Avery, Deputy Solicitor, on the brief), Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

SUMMARY ORDER

Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order filed on or after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by federal rule of appellate procedure 32.1 and this court's local rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this court, a party must cite either the federal appendix or an electronic database (with the notation "summary order"). A party citing a summary order must serve a copy of it on any party not represented by counsel.

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 14th day of September, two thousand twenty-three.

Appeal from a denial of a motion to modify an injunction by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (J. Paul Oetken, Judge).

FOR RELIEF DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS: FRED A. ROWLEY, JR. (Matthew K. Donohue and Michael S. Sommer, on the brief), Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &Rosati, P.C., Los Angeles, CA, &New York, NY.

FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE: PAUL G. ALVAREZ, Senior Appellate Counsel (Megan Barbero, General Counsel, and John W. Avery, Deputy Solicitor, on the brief), Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC.

PRESENT: JON O. NEWMAN, JOSE A. CABRANES, MARIA ARAUJO KAHN, Circuit Judges.

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the district court's denial of the motion to modify is AFFIRMED.

After oral argument and careful consideration, we AFFIRM the well-reasoned order of the district court.


Summaries of

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Lizhao Su

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Sep 14, 2023
No. 23-575 (2d Cir. Sep. 14, 2023)
Case details for

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Lizhao Su

Case Details

Full title:Securities and Exchange Commission, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lizhao Su…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Sep 14, 2023

Citations

No. 23-575 (2d Cir. Sep. 14, 2023)

Citing Cases

Wash. State Inv. Bd. v. Odebrecht S.A.

(holding that where a default judgment was "entered as a sanction for bad conduct, and the party being…

Gold Coast Transp. Serv. v. NTI-NY, Inc.

aff'd sub nom. SEC v. Su, No. 23-575, 2023 WL 5970952 (2d Cir. Sept. 14, 2023). That is the case…