From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Haarman

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division
Feb 6, 2024
1:21-CV-00235-DAE (W.D. Tex. Feb. 6, 2024)

Opinion

1:21-CV-00235-DAE

02-06-2024

SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff v. PAUL W HAARMAN, PATRICK E DUKE, APEG ENERGY GP, LLC, Defendants


ORDER

DUSTIN M. HOWELL, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Before the Court is Matthew Ford's-attorney for Defendant Patrick E. Duke- Motion for Withdrawal as Counsel, Dkt. 61. The District Judge referred the motion to the undersigned for disposition. The motion indicates that for several months, Duke has not responded to Ford's calls or emails and that Duke is “seriously in arrears” on his bills for fees and costs. Id. at 4-5.

The Court set the motion for hearing, Dkt. 63, at which Ford and counsel for Plaintiff Securities & Exchange Commission, were present. Duke, despite receiving notice from Ford that the Court had ordered his appearance at the hearing, see id., did not appear. After considering the motion, its accompanying declaration, and the arguments at the hearing, the Court announced its ruling, and the reasons for it, on the record.

For the reasons stated on the record, the Court GRANTS Ford's Motion for Withdrawal as Counsel, Dkt. 61.


Summaries of

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Haarman

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division
Feb 6, 2024
1:21-CV-00235-DAE (W.D. Tex. Feb. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Haarman

Case Details

Full title:SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff v. PAUL W HAARMAN, PATRICK E…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division

Date published: Feb 6, 2024

Citations

1:21-CV-00235-DAE (W.D. Tex. Feb. 6, 2024)