From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Femenia

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
May 31, 2022
Civil Action 3:12-cv-803-GCM (W.D.N.C. May. 31, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:12-cv-803-GCM

05-31-2022

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. JOHN W. FEMENIA, SHAWN C. HEGEDUS, DANIELLE C. LAURENTI, CORAM REAL ESTATE HOLDING, INC., GOLDSTAR P.S. INC., ROGER A. WILLIAMS, KENNETH M. RABY, FRANK M. BURGESS, JAMES A. HAYES, MATTHEW J. MUSANTE, ANTHONY C. MUSANTE and AARON M. WENS, Defendants, and KRISTINE LACK and CHRISTINE E. MUSANTE, Relief Defendants.


JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT DANIELLE C. LAURENTI

The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a complaint and a First Amended Complaint (collectively, “Complaint”) and Defendant Danielle C. Laurenti (“Defendant” or “Laurenti”), having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court's jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Judgment: and Defendant having admitted the facts set forth in the Consent of Defendant and acknowledged that his conduct violated the federal securities laws

I.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant and Defendant's agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C, § 78j(b)J and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17.......G.F.R. § 240.lOb-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security:

(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
(b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or
(c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant's officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).

II.

Upon motion of the Commission, the Court shall determine whether it is appropriate to order disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and/or a civil penalty pursuant Section 21(d)(3) and 21A of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C, § 78u(d)(3) and ZSlkL] and, if so, the amount(s) of the disgorgement and/or civil penalty. The Defendant further understands that, if disgorgement is ordered, Defendant shall pay prejudgment interest thereon, calculated from the dates of the violations, based on the rate of interest used by the Internal Revenue Service for the underpayment of federal income tax as set forth in 26 U, S, C, § 6621(a)(2). In connection with the Commission's motion for disgorgement and/or civil penalty, and at any hearing held on such a motion: (a) Defendant will be precluded from arguing that she did not violate the federal securities laws as alleged in the Complaint; (b) Defendant may not challenge the validity of the Consent or this Judgment; (c) solely for the purposes of such motion, the allegations of the Complaint shall be accepted as and deemed true by the Court; and (d) the Court may determine the issues raised in the motion on the basis of affidavits, declarations, excerpts of sworn deposition or investigative testimony, and documentary evidence, without regard to the standards for summary judgment contained in Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In connection with the Commission's motion for disgorgement and/or civil penalty, the parties may take discovery, including discovery from appropriate non-parties.

III.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein.

IV.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, solely for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C, §523 , the allegations in the Complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C, §523(a)(19) .

V.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Judgment.

VI.

There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Judgment forthwith and without further notice.


Summaries of

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Femenia

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
May 31, 2022
Civil Action 3:12-cv-803-GCM (W.D.N.C. May. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Femenia

Case Details

Full title:SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. JOHN W. FEMENIA, SHAWN…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: May 31, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 3:12-cv-803-GCM (W.D.N.C. May. 31, 2022)