From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Braslau

United States District Court Central District of California
Mar 6, 2017
Case No. 2:14-cv-01290-ODW (AJWx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 2:14-cv-01290-ODW (AJWx)

03-06-2017

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. SAMUEL BRASLAU; RAND J. CHORTKOFF; and STUART E. RAWITT, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") moved for summary judgment against the Estate of Rand J. Chortkoff, the one remaining defendant in this case, and Chortkoff's estate did not oppose. (See ECF Nos. 85; 90.) On March 3, 2017, this Court granted the SEC's motion.

In accordance with that Order, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:

1. Rand J. Chortkoff is liable for the SEC's claims of fraud and acting as an unregistered broker-dealer;

2. The Estate of Rand J. Chortkoff shall disgorge the amount of One Hundred Fifty-Three Thousand, Four Hundred Dollars ($153,400) to Plaintiff SEC, representing Chortkoff's ill-gotten gains; and

3. The Estate of Rand J. Chortkoff shall pay Plaintiff SEC prejudgment interest in the amount of Twelve Thousand, Six Hundred and Fifteen Dollars ($12,615).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

March 6, 2017

/s/ _________

OTIS D. WRIGHT, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Braslau

United States District Court Central District of California
Mar 6, 2017
Case No. 2:14-cv-01290-ODW (AJWx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2017)
Case details for

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Braslau

Case Details

Full title:SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. SAMUEL BRASLAU; RAND J…

Court:United States District Court Central District of California

Date published: Mar 6, 2017

Citations

Case No. 2:14-cv-01290-ODW (AJWx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2017)