From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Amundsen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 29, 2011
No. C 83-00711 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 83-00711 WHA

11-29-2011

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH S. AMUNDSEN, Defendant.


ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO SEC REPLY

Pro se defendant Joseph Amundsen has filed an "answer to SEC reply to defendant's answer to find defendant in civil contempt" (Dkt. No. 28). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(d) "once a reply is filed, no additional memoranda, papers or letters may be filed without prior Court approval" unless new evidence has been submitted in the reply brief or the party seeks to file a statement of recent decision. Plaintiff filed its reply on November 22, 2011. The recent filing by defendant appears to be a summary of defendant's response brief and does not fall within one of the exceptions under Rule 7-3(d). Defendant did not obtain prior approval to make this filing. Thus, defendant's answer to the SEC reply is S TRICKEN.

* * *

In the recent filing, defendant asks for the exact location of the hearing. The hearing will be held in Courtroom 8, on the 19th Floor, U.S. District Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Amundsen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 29, 2011
No. C 83-00711 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Amundsen

Case Details

Full title:SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH S. AMUNDSEN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 29, 2011

Citations

No. C 83-00711 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)