From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SEAY v. INSURANCE CO

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1935
179 S.E. 888 (N.C. 1935)

Opinion

(Filed 22 May, 1935.)

Appeal and Error J d —

Where the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not sitting, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.

APPEAL by defendant from McElroy, J., at February Term, 1935, of GUILFORD.

Jones Fisher for plaintiff.

Roberson, Haworth Reese for defendant.


Civil action to recover agent's commissions on insurance premium renewals, "paid to and accepted by the (defendant) company, while this (agency) contract is in force . . . limit 9 years."

The defendant sought to terminate its agency contract with the plaintiff, prior to the expiration of the ninth renewal of some of the policies written by plaintiff. This suit is to recover commissions on such renewals up to the 9th on each policy.

Judgment of nonsuit was entered in the municipal court of the city of High Point, which was reversed on appeal to the Superior Court of Guilford County.

From the ruling of the Superior Court the defendant appeals, assigning errors.


The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Clarkson, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed and stands, according to the uniform practice of appellate courts, as the decision in this case, without becoming a precedent. Com. Co. v. Mfg. Co., 201 N.C. 823, 159 S.E. 411; Raynor v. Ins. Co., 193 N.C. 385, 137 S.E. 137; Jenkins v. Lbr. Co., 187 N.C. 864, 123 S.E. 82; Miller v. Bank, 176 N.C. 152, 96 S.E. 977; Durham v. R. R., 113 N.C. 240, 18 S.E. 208.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

SEAY v. INSURANCE CO

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1935
179 S.E. 888 (N.C. 1935)
Case details for

SEAY v. INSURANCE CO

Case Details

Full title:R. FRANK SEAY v. SENTINEL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: May 1, 1935

Citations

179 S.E. 888 (N.C. 1935)
179 S.E. 888

Citing Cases

SEAY v. INSURANCE CO

PER CURIAM. In the case of Seay v. Ins. Co., 208 N.C. 832, is the following: "Civil action to recover agent's…

Powell v. Veasey

PER CURIAM. The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Devin, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior…